- 3,278
- 4,972
- 113
- Location
- Olympia/WA
2), once again, the original author of that document's name is clearly visible at the top right corner next to the date. It's a wire pinout list, not some proprietary circuit diagram.
3) yes, he altered the original. That's the entire point is that it's altered to still perform the same end goal (vehicle will start and run and function) while eliminating some unnecessary functions. By your logic once someone makes something nobody else is ever allowed to touch it as that would be theft of intellectual property.
4) CAMO is a great guy. I have no idea if he has any issue with that thread with the pinout list that he wrote up being shared or not as he has not said anything about it that I know of. It doesn't mean he is okay with it as I am not going to put words into his mouth, but I haven't seen anywherer that it was disputed.
5) CAMO did do a lot of work to make a functional bypass to the original box, but we're talking technology from the 1980's and earlier, not something that is actually current on the market. As I wasn't on this site at the time and wasn't involved in any of the development, all I have to go off of is a thread where one person wrote notes on the printed notes of another person.
If the original creator of a technology chooses to file a copyright/patent for something, then by all means it's their product, and using it or it's design without authorization is indeed a big offense, and I would also not willingly do business with anyone that stole that intellectual property.
6)thank you for supporting integrity. Too many people choose to look the other way.
7) you didn't call out Tobash? You might not have meant to, but from a third party perspective, you very much did call him out, insult him and his work. I invite you to reread what you posted immediately after his post and try to do so from an outside viewpoint and see how it might be taken in a negative way.
3) yes, he altered the original. That's the entire point is that it's altered to still perform the same end goal (vehicle will start and run and function) while eliminating some unnecessary functions. By your logic once someone makes something nobody else is ever allowed to touch it as that would be theft of intellectual property.
4) CAMO is a great guy. I have no idea if he has any issue with that thread with the pinout list that he wrote up being shared or not as he has not said anything about it that I know of. It doesn't mean he is okay with it as I am not going to put words into his mouth, but I haven't seen anywherer that it was disputed.
5) CAMO did do a lot of work to make a functional bypass to the original box, but we're talking technology from the 1980's and earlier, not something that is actually current on the market. As I wasn't on this site at the time and wasn't involved in any of the development, all I have to go off of is a thread where one person wrote notes on the printed notes of another person.
If the original creator of a technology chooses to file a copyright/patent for something, then by all means it's their product, and using it or it's design without authorization is indeed a big offense, and I would also not willingly do business with anyone that stole that intellectual property.
6)thank you for supporting integrity. Too many people choose to look the other way.
7) you didn't call out Tobash? You might not have meant to, but from a third party perspective, you very much did call him out, insult him and his work. I invite you to reread what you posted immediately after his post and try to do so from an outside viewpoint and see how it might be taken in a negative way.
I did a lot of research prior to my decision. I saw your product. Viewed the links through the posting dates and compared to the other products I was checking out. Your version seemed like a poor attempt to chose cheap components in an attempt to lower price, while affecting quality and robustness. Due to learning in 37 years of electronic and CNC repair... a good technician never blames his tools... I didn't want to sacrifice quality for a few dollars, or I would have bought your product. However, it also didn't make sense to pay you for your poor attempt at someone else's intellectual property.
